Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Cartilage Myringoplasty in Chronic Otitis Media

Document Type : Original

Authors

1 ENT and Head & Neck Research Center, The Five Senses Health Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

2 Skull Base Research Center, The Five Senses Health Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

3 Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Amir Alam Hospital, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction:
Operations on the tympanic membrane of the middle ear, myringoplasty, and tympanoplasty are now widely accepted, and attempts are underway all over the world to standardize the surgical techniques. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic cartilage myringoplasty in patients suffering from chronic otitis media (COM).
 
Materials and Methods:
This clinical trial study compared 130 patients with COM who underwent transcanal endoscopic myringoplasty by repairing perforation using auricular concha cartilage under general anesthesia (n=75) and conventional repairing method by postauricular incision and tympanomeatal flap elevation under microscopic surgery (n=55).
 
Results:
According to the results, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of hearing gain 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery (P=0.063); however, higher hearing gain scores were observed in the endoscopic group. Moreover, lower recovery time and post-operative pain were reported in patients who underwent the endoscopic approach, compared to those who treated with the conventional repairing method (P<0.001).
 
Conclusion:
Endoscopic myringoplasty technique is a safe and effective way to improve hearing loss as much as the conventional method. However, due to the lower recovery time and post-operative pain, it seems to be the method of choice in myringoplasty surgery.

Keywords

References

  1. Monasta L, Ronfani L, Marchetti F, Montico M, Vecchi Brumatti L, Bavcar A, et al. Burden of disease caused by otitis media: systematic review and global estimates. PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e36226.
  2. Reiss M, Reiss G. [Suppurative chronic otitis media: etiology, diagnosis and therapy]. Med Monatsschr Pharm. 2010;33(1):11-6; quiz 7-8.
  3. Caye-Thomasen P, Hermansson A, Bakaletz L, Hellstrom S, Kanzaki S, Kerschner J, et al. Panel 3: Recent advances in anatomy, pathology, and cell biology in relation to otitis media pathogenesis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013; 148(4 Suppl): E37-51.
  4. Rovers MM, Schilder AG, Zielhuis GA, Rosenfeld RMJTl. Otitis media. 2004; 363(9407): 465-73.
  5. Marchisio P, Chonmaitree T, Leibovitz E, Lieberthal A, Lous J, Mandel E, et al. Panel 7: Treatment and comparative effectiveness research. 2013; 48(4_suppl):E102-E21.
  6. Acuin JJGWHOiId. Dept. of Child and Adolescent Health and Development, WHO Programme for the Prevention of Blindness and Deafness “Chronic suppurative otitis media: burden of illness and management options.”. 2004:83.
  7. Tarabichi MJO, Neurotology. Transcanal endoscopic management of cholesteatoma. 2010; 31(4):580-8.
  8. Júnior JFN, Cruz DNJIoO. Ear endoscopic surgery: dissection of the middle ear.2009;13: 46-52.
  9. El-Begermy M, editor Endoscopic-assisted stapedectomy. International Congress Series; 2003: Elsevier.
  10. Marchioni D, Alicandri‐Ciufelli M, Molteni G, Genovese E, Presutti LJTl. Endoscopic tympanoplasty in patients with attic retraction pockets. 2010;120(9):1847-55.
  11. Daneshi A, Jahandideh H, Daneshvar A, Safdarian MJBjoo. Bilateral same-day endoscopic transcanal cartilage tympanoplasty: initial results. 2017;83(4):411-5.
  12. Huang T-Y, Ho K-Y, Wang L-F, Chien C-Y, Wang H-MJJIAO. A comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic approach type 1 tympanoplasty for simple chronic otitis media. 2016; 12(1):28-31.
  13. Farahani F, Shariatpanahi E, Jahanshahi J, Poorolajal JJPo. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic and microscopic procedures for identifying different middle ear structures and remaining disease in patients with chronic otitis media: a prospective cohort study. 2015; 10(7): e0132890.
  14. Daneshi A, Jahandideh HJEAoO-R-L. Totally endoscopic stapes surgery without packing: novel technique bringing most comfort to the patients. 2016; 273(3):631-4.
  15. Daneshi A, Asghari A, Mohebbi S, Farhadi M, Farahani F, Mohseni MJIjoo. Total endoscopic approach in glomus tympanicum surgery. 2017; 29(95): 305.
  16. Ulku CHJJoCS. Endoscopy-assisted ear surgery for treatment of chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma, adhesion, or retraction pockets. 2017; 28(4):1017-20.
  17. Lade H, Choudhary SR, Vashishth AJEAoO-R-L. Endoscopic vs microscopic myringoplasty: a different perspective. 2014; 271(7): 897-902.
  18. Kuo C-h, Wu H-mJEAoO-R-L. Comparison of endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty. 2017;274(7):2727-32.
  19. Choi N, Noh Y, Park W, Lee JJ, Yook S, Choi JE, et al. Comparison of endoscopic tympanoplasty to microscopic tympanoplasty. 2017; 10(1):44.
  20. Kaya I, Turhal G, Ozturk A, Gode S, Bilgen C, Kirazli TJAo-l. Results of endoscopic cartilage tympanoplasty procedure with limited tympanomeatal flap incision. 2017;137(11):1174-7.
Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
Volume 32, Issue 5 - Serial Number 112
September and October 2020
Pages 263-269

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics