Tragal Perichondrium and Composite Cartilage Graft Complimenting Endoscopic Tympanoplasty in True Sense: A Comparison

Document Type : Original

Authors

1 Department of ENT, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical and Health Science Patel Nagar, Dehradun.

2 Senior Medical Officer ONGC Hospital Ballupur Dehradun.

3 Senior Consultant, ENT, Max Superspeciality Hospital Mussorriee Road, Dehradun.

Abstract

Introduction:
In days of scar less surgeries it has become necessary for otologists to concentrate on tympanoplasties without external incisions. This study compares the anatomical and functional results of tragal perichondrium graft and perichondrium-cartilage composite graft for transcanal endoscopic tympanoplasties in Himalayan region.
Methods and Materials:
This prospective  study included 60 subjects of chronic otitis media (mucosal type), who underwent transcanal endoscopic underlay type I tympanoplasty and were divided into two groups. In 30 cases tragal perichondrium graft and in rest of 30 cases Tragal perichondrium Cartilage composite graft was used. Anatomical and functional outcomes were evaluated at 6 months time.
Results:
Hearing gain comparing Audiometric data between the tragal perichondrial graft group and tragal perichondrial cartilage composite graft group at 6 months showed no statistically significant differences (P= 0.9533). Assessment of anatomical outcome indicated a greater number of complications in the tragal perichondrial graft group although it was not statistically significant (P=0.6360 in anterior graft failure group , P =0.1322 in reperforation group and P= 0.1056 in retraction group). 
Conclusion:
Functional results validated both the grafting material while anatomical results are slightly better in tragal perichondrial cartilage composite graft group in term of re perforation and retraction. More over [A1] with[A2]  use of tragal grafts endoscopic tympanoplasty fulfils its true meaning as no visible scar and post operative patient morbidity is prevented.



 [A1]Moreover




 [A2]delete

Keywords


  1. Ozbek C, Ciftçi O, Tuna EE, Yazkan O, Ozdem C. A comparison of cartilage palisades and fascia in type 1 tympanoplasty in children: anatomic and functional results. Otol Neurotol 2008; 29:679–83
  2. Kazikdas KC, Onal K, Boyraz I, Karabulut E. Palisade cartilage tympanoplasty for management of subtotal perforations: a comparison with the temporalis fascia technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 264:985–9.
  3. Buckingham RA. Fascia and perichondrium atrophy in tympanoplasty and recurrent middle ear atelectasis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992; 101:755–8.
  4. Yung M.Cartilage tympanoplasty: literature review.J Laryngol Otol 2008; 122:663-672.
  5. Dornhoffer JL. Cartilage tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am.2006; 39:1161-1167.
  6. Ulkü CH. Cartilage tympanoplasty with island technique for reconstruction of tympanic membrane perforation: anatomic and audiological results. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg 2010; 20:7–12.
  7. Kirazli T, Bilgen C, Midilli R, Ogüt F. Hearing results after primary cartilage tympanoplasty with island technique. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 132:933–7.
  8. Beutner D, Huttenbrink KB, Stumpf R, Beleites T, Zahnert T, Luers JC et al. Cartilage plate tympanoplasty. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31:105–10.
  9. Anderson J, Cayé-Thomasen P, Tos M. A comparison of cartilage palisades and fascia in tympanoplasty after surgery for sinus or tensa retraction cholesteatoma in children. Otol Neurotol 2004; 25:856–63.
  10. Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Romaguera Lliso MD, Sanz Gonzalo JJ. Cartilage palisades in type III tympanoplasty: anatomic and functional long-term results. Otol Neurotol 2003; 24:38–42.
  11. De Seta E, De Seta D, Covelli E, Viccaro M, Filipo R. Type I tympanoplasty with island chondro-perichondrial graft : the preferred technique?  J Laryngol Otol 2013; 124:354-358.
  12. Matthew JG, Mason JC, Lambert PR. Hearing results after primary cartilage tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope.  2000; 110: 1994-9. 
  13. Chen XW, Yang H, Gao RZ, Yu R, Gao ZQ. Perichondrium/cartilage composite graft for repairing large tympanic membrane perforations and hearing improvement. Chin Med J (Engl). 2010; 123(3):301-4.