Comparing Antegrade and Retrograde Parotidectomy:Surgical Parameters and Complications

Document Type : Original

Authors

1 Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

2 Sinus and Surgical Endoscopic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

3 Otorhinolaryngologist, Mashhad, Iran.

4 Department of Anesthesiology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

5 Nuclear Medicine Physician, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction:
Patotidectomy is the treatment of choice for superficial parotid gland lesions. The present study aimed to assess the facial nerve status, as well as peri-and postsurgical complications, in two surgical techniques (antegrade and retrograde) for parotidectomy.
 
Materials and Methods:
This study was conducted on 56 patients diagnosed with parotid neoplasms from 2013-2015. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups of antegrade and retrograde. In the retrograde group, the dissection was performed initially to expose the facial nerve branches, while in the antegrade approach, the facial nerve trunk was exposed initially. Different values, such as intraoperative bleeding, mass characteristics, and the time for different sections of the surgery, were noted. The facial nerve was examined after the surgery; moreover, hospital stay and drain removal time was also noted. During the six-month postoperative period, complications and squeals were also noted. 
 
Results:
Based on the results, antegrade nerve dissection was performed in 24 patients, while retrograde nerve dissection was carried out in 25 patients. The two groups were compared for intraoperative bleeding, drain output, and drain removal time. Hospital stay was found to be statistically higher in the retrograde group (P<0.05). Other complications and morbidities, such as facial nerve trauma, sialoceles, salivary fistulas, Frey’s syndrome, skin sensory changes, and surgery time, were not statistically different (P≥0.05). 
 
Conclusions:
As evidenced by the obtained results, retrograde dissection had higher intraoperative bleeding and longer hospital stay. It seems that skin flap dissection is more extensive in retrograde dissection, leading to more bleeding in this approach. These differences, although statistically significant, are not clinically important; consequently, surgeons’ experience and knowledge about the two approaches are of utmost importance.

Keywords


  1. Flint PW, Haughey BH, Niparko JK, Richardson MA, Lund VJ, Robbins KT, et al. Cummings Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery E-Book: Head and Neck Surgery, 3-Volume Set. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2010 Mar 9.
  2. O’Regan B, Bharadwaj G, Bhopal S, Cook V. Facial nerve morbidity after retrograde nerve dissection in parotid surgery for benign disease: a

 

10-year prospective observational study of 136 cases. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2007 Mar 1;45(2):101-7.

  1. O’Regan B, Bharadwaj G, Elders A. Techniques for dissection of the facial nerve in benign parotid surgery: a cross specialty survey of oral and maxillofacial and ear nose and throat surgeons in the UK. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2008 Oct 1;46(7):564-6.
  2. Pia F, Policarpo M, Dosdegani R, Olina M, Brovelli F, Aluffi P. Centripetal approach to the facial nerve in parotid surgery: personal experience. Acta otorhinolaryngologica italica. 2003 Apr; 23(2): 111-5.
  3. Davis RA. Surgical anatomy of the facial nerve and parotid gland based upon a study of 350 cervicofacial halves. Surg. Gynecol. Obstetr. 1956;102:385-412.
  4. Katz AD, Catalano P. The clinical significance of the various anastomotic branches of the facial nerve: report of 100 patients. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery. 1987 Sep 1; 113(9): 959-62..
  5. McCormack LJ. The surgical anatomy of the facial nerve with special reference to the parotid gland. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1945;80:620.
  6. Bhattacharyya N, Richardson ME, Gugino LD. An objective assessment of the advantages of retrograde parotidectomy. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. 2004 Oct;131(4):392-6.
  7. Adeyemo WL, Taiwo OA, Somefun OA, Olasoji HO, Ndukwe KC, Fashima AA, et al. A survey of facial nerve dessection techniques in benign parotid surgery among maxillofacial and ear, nose, and throat surgeons in Nigeria. Nigerian journal of clinical practice. 2011;14(1): 83-7.
  8. Shrestha PU, Gurung NV. Superficial Parotidectomy: Comparison of Antegrade Versus Retrograde Facial Nerve Dissection. Post-Graduate Medical Journal of NAMS. 2011 Jul 1;11(01):38-40.
  9. Emodi O, El-Naaj IA, Gordin A, Akrish S, Peled M. Superficial parotidectomy versus retrograde partial superficial parotidectomy in treating benign salivary gland tumor (pleomorphic adenoma). Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2010 Sep 1;68(9):2092-8.
  10. Anjum K, Revington PJ, Irvine GH. Superficial parotidectomy: antegrade compared with modified retrograde dissections of the facial nerve. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2008 Sep 1;46(6):433-4.
  11. Chow TL, Choi CY, Cheung SH, Lam SH. Superficial parotidectomy: antegrade versus retrograde facial nerve dissection. Surgical Practice. 2011 Nov 1;15(4):120-3.