Evaluation of Quality of Life in Adults Following Cochlear Implantation

Document Type : Original

Authors

1 Otolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

2 Otolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor of Psychology Unitec Institute of Technology, New Zealand.

10.22038/ijorl.2025.89667.4004

Abstract

Introduction:
Cochlear implantation is a surgical procedure which provides the sense of hearing in patients with sensorineural hearing loss, particularly when conventional hearing aids are no longer effective. Although cochlear implantation is mostly used for children, increasing number of adults are also benefiting from this life-changing technology. As cochlear implantation can improve communication in adults, enhance quality of life and socio-emotional well-being, the primary aim of the present study is to investigate the quality-of-life improvement in adult cochlear implant recipients
 Materials and Methods:
This quasi-experimental single-group pretest-posttest study utilized the Persian standardized version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire (WHO-QOL-BREF) to assess quality-of-life improvements in 26 adult cochlear implant recipients with a mean age of 36.19 ± 12.71 years. The questionnaire was administered at two time points: the first month after receiving the speech processor and six months later. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 21.
Results:
A repeated-measures ANOVA was performed to examine the effects of cochlear implantation and the subsequent rehabilitation program on four quality-of-life dimensions: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and perception of the living environment. The analysis revealed a significant main effect of time on quality of life, indicating notable improvements across all dimensions from pre- to post-treatment.
Conclusion:
The pre- and post-test analysis using the WHO-QOL-BREF questionnaire demonstrated a significant enhancement in the quality of life among adult cochlear implant recipients. Therefore, cochlear implantation is an effective intervention for treating hearing impairment in adults suffering from progressive hearing loss.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Yoon PJ. Pediatric cochlear implantation. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2011;23(3):346-50. DOI: 1097/MOP.0b013e32834618ec
  2. Stephenson J. WHO Report Predicts Hearing Loss for 1 in 4 People Worldwide by 2050. JAMA Health Forum. 2021; 2(3): e210357. DOI: 1001/ jamahealthforum. 2021.0357
  3. Ciorba A, Bianchini C, Pelucchi S, Pastore A. The impact of hearing loss on the quality of life of elderly adults. Clin Interv Aging. 2012;7:159-63. DOI: 2147/CIA.S26059
  4. Sung YK, Li L, Blake C, Betz J, Lin FR. Association of Hearing Loss and Loneliness in Older Adults. J Aging Health. 2016;28(6):979-94. DOI: 1177/0898264315614570
  5. Lin XJ LI, Fan SY. Methodological issues in measuring health-related quality of life. Tzu-Chi Med J. 2013;1:8-12. doi: 10.1016/j. tcmj. 2012. 09.002
  6. Sousa AF, Couto MIV, Martinho-Carvalho AC. Quality of life and cochlear implant: results in adults with postlingual hearing loss. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;84(4):494-9. DOI: 1016/j. bjorl.2017.06.005
  7. Santos NPD, Couto MIV, Martinho-Carvalho AC. Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ): translation, cultural adaptation, and application in adults with cochlear implants. Codas. 2017; 29(6): e 20170007. DOI: 1590/2317-1782/ 20172017007
  8. Muigg F, Rossi S, Kühn H, Weichbold V. Perceived social support improves health-related quality of life in cochlear implant patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024;281(9):4757-62. DOI: 1007/s00405-024-08706-w
  9. Achangwa C, Lee TJ, Park J, Lee MS. Quality of Life and Associated Factors of International Students in South Korea: A Cross-Sectional Study Using the WHOQOL-BREF Instrument. Healthcare (Basel). 2022;10(7). DOI: 3390/ healthcare 10071262
  10. Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(2):299-310. DOI: 1023/ B: QURE.0000018486.91360.00
  11. Jahanlou AS, Karami NA. WHO quality of life-BREF 26 questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Persian version and compare it with Iranian diabetics quality of life questionnaire in diabetic patients. Prim Care Diabetes. 2011;5(2):103-7. DOI: 1016/j.pcd.2011.02.001
  12. Bekele Okuba T, Lystad RP, Boisvert I, McMaugh A, Moore RC, Walsan R, et al. Cochlear implantation impact on health service utilisation and social outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):929.  DOI: 1186/s12913-023-09900-y
  13. Andries E, Gilles A, Topsakal V, Vanderveken OM, Van de Heyning P, Van Rompaey V, et al. Systematic Review of Quality of Life Assessments after Cochlear Implantation in Older Adults. Audiol Neurootol. 2021;26(2):61-75. DOI: 1159/ 00050 8433
  14. Rostkowska J, Skarzynski PH, Kobosko J, Gos E, Skarzynski H. Health-related quality of life in adults with profound postlingual hearing loss before and after cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;278(9):3393-9. DOI: 1007/s00405-021-06866-7
  15. Sladen DP, Peterson A, Schmitt M, Olund A, Teece K, Dowling B, et al. Health-related quality of life outcomes following adult cochlear implantation: A prospective cohort study. Cochlear Implants Int. 2017;18(3):130-5. DOI: 1080/14670100.2017.1293203
  16. Wang R, Zhao N, Luo J, Chao X, Fan Z, Wang H, et al. Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages. J Vis Exp. 2023(193). DOI: 3791/64552
  17. Monshizadeh L, Vameghi R, Rahimi M, Sajedi F, Hashemi SB, Yadegari F, et al. Is There Any Association Between Language Acquisition and Cognitive Development in Cochlear-Implanted Children? J Int Adv Otol. 2021;17(3):195-9. DOI: 5152/iao.2021.8990
  18. Monshizadeh L, Vameghi R, Sajedi F, Yadegari F, Hashemi SB, Kirchem P, et al. Comparison of Social Interaction between Cochlear-Implanted Children with Normal Intelligence Undergoing Auditory Verbal Therapy and Normal-Hearing Children: A Pilot Study. J Int Adv Otol. 2018;14(1):34-8. DOI: 5152/iao.2018.3663
  19. Hardman G, Kyle F, Herman R, Morgan G. Pre-linguistic social communication skills and post implant language outcomes in deaf children with cochlear implants. J Commun Disord. 2022; 100: 106275. DOI: 1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106275
  20. McRackan TR, Hand BN, Velozo CA, Dubno JR. Development and Implementation of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) Functional Staging System. Laryngoscope. 2022;132 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S1-s13. DOI: 1002/ lary.30381
  21. Monshizadeh L, Hashemi SB, Akhlaghi A, Kazemi T. Evaluating the Relation Between Mothers' Depression Level and Their Cochlear Implanted Children's Social Performance. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024;76(4):3234-8. DOI: 1007/s12070-024-04653-4
  22. Wick CC, Kallogjeri D, McJunkin JL, Durakovic N, Holden LK, Herzog JA, et al. Hearing and Quality-of-Life Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation in Adult Hearing Aid Users 65 Years or Older: A Secondary Analysis of a Nonrandomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;146(10):925-32. DOI: 1001/ jamaoto.2020.1585.
Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
Volume 37, Issue 6
November and December 2025
Pages 321-326

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics