Temporal Processing Evaluation in Tinnitus Patients: Results on Analysis of Gap in Noise and Duration Pattern Test

Document Type: Original

Authors

1 Department of Audiology, Faculty of Rehabilitation. Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Audiology, Faculty of Rehabilitation. Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

3 Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Imam Khomeini Educational Complex Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

4 Department of Audiology, Faculty of Rehabilitation. Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction:
Tinnitus is a perception of sound without external source. For complete assessment of tinnitus, central auditory processing abilities should be considered in addition to the routine psychological evaluation of tinnitus characteristics. Temporal processing is one of the important auditory skills that are necessary for complex higher level auditory processing.
 
Materials and Methods:
20 tinnitus patients and 20 healthy volunteers without tinnitus, all with normal auditory thresholds
(≤ 20 dBnHL), were enrolled in present study. Pure Tone Audiometry (PTA), Tinnitus evaluation, Gap in Noise (GIN) test and Duration Pattern Test (DPT) were applied to all participants.
 
Result:
Analysis of GIN test revealed statistically significant increases in an approximate threshold value of gap detection in the patients group, both in right and left sides (P=0.007 and
P=0.011, respectively). Comparison of percentage of correct responses in between two groups was also statistically meaningful in right and left ears (P=0.019 and P=0.026, respectively). The comparison of different parameters of DPT in two study groups revealed no significant differences in percentage of correct responses between two groups (P>0.05).
 
Conclusion:
GIN test results identified auditory temporal resolution difficulties in patients with tinnitus, meaning that in spite of normal auditory thresholds there may be some possibility of abnormality in central auditory processing functions.
 

Keywords


1. Meymaneh Jahromi A, Mostaan L. Treatment of subjective peripheral tinnitus with Transcutaneous.  He Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. 2007; 19(47):            11-14.

2. Lockwood AH, Salvi RJ, Coad M, Towsley M, Wack D, Murphy B. The functional neuroanatomy of tinnitus. Neurology 1998;50(1):114-20.

3. Gerken GM. Central tinnitus and lateral inhibition: an auditory brainstem model. Hear Res. 1996;97(1-2):75-83.

4. Eggermont JJ, Roberts LE. The neuroscience of tinnitus. Trends in neurosciences. 2004;27(11):676-82.

5. Musiek FE, Chermak GD, Weihing J. Handbook of (central) auditory processing disorder. Cambridge Univ Press; 2007, Vol:1.

6. Musiek FE, Shinn JB, Jirsa R, Bamiou DE, Baran JA, Zaida E. GIN (Gaps-In-Noise) test performance in subjects with confirmed central auditory nervous system involvement. Ear and hearing. 2005; 26(6): 608.

7. Turner JG, Brozoski TJ, Bauer CA, Parrish JL, Myers K, Hughes LF. Gap detection deficits in rats with tinnitus: a potential novel screening tool. Behav Neurosci 2006; 120(1): 188-95.

8. Fournier P, Hébert S. Gap detection deficits in humans with tinnitus as assessed with the acoustic startle paradigm: Does tinnitus fill in the gap? Hear Res 2012; [Epub ahead of print].

9. Onishi E, Fukuda Y, Suzuki F. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in tinnitus patients. The international tinnitus journal 2004; 10(1): 13.

10. Ami M, Abdullah A, Awang MA, Liyab B, Saim L. Relation of distortion product otoacoustic emission with tinnitus. The Laryngoscope. 2008; 118(4): 712.

11. Hesse G, Schaaf H, Laubert A. Specific findings in distortion product otoacoustic emissions and growth functions with chronic tinnitus. The international tinnitus journal 2005;11(1):6.

12. Ashton H, Reid K, Marsh R, Johnson I, Alter K, Griffiths T. High frequency localised “hot spots” in temporal lobes of patients with intractable tinnitus: A quantitative electroencephalographic (QEEG) study. Neuroscience Letters. 2007; 426: 23–28.

13. Bartels H, Staal MJ, Albers FWJ. Tinnitus and neural plasticity of the brain. Otol neurotol 2007; 28(2):178.

14. Sepehrnejad M, Mohammadkhani G, Farahani S, Faghihzadeh S, Khoshk MHN. Comparison of gap in noise test results between congenital blind and sighted subjects with normal hearing. Audiol. 2011; 20(2):22-9.

15. Sanches SGG, Samelli AG, Nishiyama AK, Sanchez TG, Carvallo RMM. GIN Test (Gaps-in-Noise) in normal listeners with and without tinnitus. Pró-Fono R. Atual. Cient 2010; 22(3):257-62.

16. Haas R, Smurzynski J, Fagelson M. The Effect of Tinnitus on Gap Detection. Tinnitus Today.Am Tinnitus Assoc pub 2012;10-11.

17. Robin DA, Royer FL. Age-related changes in auditory temporal processing. Psychology and Aging 1989;4(2):144.
18. Werner LA, Folsom RC, Mancl LR, Syapin CL. Human auditory brainstem response to temporal gaps in noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001;44(4):737-50.