Translation, Validity, and Reliability of a Persian Version of the Iowa Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire

Document Type: Original

Authors

1 Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation. Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Statistics, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

3 Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

4 Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Imam Khomeini Educational Complex Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

5 Department of Architect Engineering , School of Technology And Engineering. Islamic Azad University of Bandar Abbas.

Abstract

Introduction:
Tinnitus is a common otologic symptom that can seriously affect a patient’s quality of life. The purpose of the present study was to translate and validate the Iowa Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ) into the Persian language, and to make it applicable as a tool for determining the effects of tinnitus on a patient’s life.
 
Materials and Methods:
The main version of the THQ was translated into the Persian language. The agreed Persian version was administered to 150 tinnitus patients. The validity of the Persian THQ was evaluated and internal reliability was confirmed using Cronbach’s α-coefficient. Finally, the effect of independent variables such as age, mean patient threshold, gender, and duration of tinnitus were considered in order to determine the psychometric properties of tinnitus.
 
Results:
After an exact translation process, the Persian THQ was found to exhibit face validity. In terms of content validity, the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) reached 100% in all but two questions. Further, in structural validity measurements, intermediate correlation with annoyance from tinnitus (r= 0.49), low correlation with duration of tinnitus (r = 0.34) and high correlation with the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) questionnaire (r = 0.84) were demonstrated. Additionally, a negligible effect of gender and age was noted on degree of tinnitus handicap (P = 0.754 and
P= 0.573, respectively). In the internal reliability assessment for Factors 1, 2, 3, and the whole questionnaire, Cronbach`s α-coefficient was 0.95, 0.92, 0.25 and 0.88, respectively.
 
Conclusion: 
The Persian version of the Iowa THQ demonstrates high validity and reliability and can be used for the determination of tinnitus handicap and for following-up in the intervention process in Persian tinnitus patients.

Keywords


1. Snow JB. Tinnitus: theory and management 2004: Pmph Bc Decker.

2. Lockwood AH, Salvi RJ, Burkard RF. Tinnitus. New England Journal of Medicine 2002; 347(12):  904-10.

3. Malouff JM, Schutte NS, Zucker LA. Tinnitus-related distress: A review of recent findings. Current Psychiatry Reports. 13(1): 31-6.

4. Vanneste SW, To WT, DeRidder D. The psycho- metric properties of the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire in a Dutch‐speaking population. Clinical Otolaryngology. 36(1): 9-16.

5. Lewis J, Stephens S, McKenna L. TINNITUS  AND SUCIDE. Clinical Otolaryngology & Allied Sciences 1994; 19(1): 50-4.

6. Jastreboff PJ, Hazell JW. Tinnitus retraining therapy: Implementing the neurophysiological model. 2004; Cambridge University Press.

7. Adams PF, Hendershot GE, Marano MA. Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 1996. Vital and health statistics. Series 10, Data from the National Health Survey 1999; (200): 1-203.

8. Hallam R, Jakes S, Hinchcliffe R. Cognitive variables in tinnitus annoyance. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 1988; 27(3): 213-22.

9. Sweetow R, Levy M. Tinnitus severity scaling for diagnostic/therapeutic usage. Hearing Instru- ments 1990; 41(2): 20-1.

10. Halford JB, Anderson SD. Tinnitus severity measured by a subjective scale, audiometry and clinical judgement. J Laryngol Otol 1991; 105(2):  89-93.

11. Newman CW, Jacobson GP, Spitzer GB.  Development of the tinnitus handicap inventory. Archives of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery 1996; 122(2): 143.

12. Erlandsson SI, Hallberg LR, Axelsson A. Psychological and audiological correlates of perceived tinnitus severity. International Journal of Audiology 1992; 31(3): 168-79.

13. Mahmoudian S, et al. Persian language version of the" Tinnitus Handicap Inventory": Translation, standardization, validity and reliability. International Tinnitus Journal 2011; 16(2): 93.

14. Kuk  FK,  et al. The psychometric properties of a tinnitus handicap questionnaire. Ear Hear 1990; 11(6):  434-45.

15. Meric C,  Pham E,  Chéry-Croze S.  (Translation and validation of the questionnaire" Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire, 1990). The Journal of otolaryngology 1997; 26(3): 167.

16. Aaronson N, et al. International quality of life assessment (IQOLA) project. Quality of life research 1992; 1(5): 349-51.

17. Shultz KS, Whitney DJ. Measurement theory in action: Case studies and exercises. 2004: Sage Publications, Incorporated.

18. Nunnally JC.  Psychometric Theory 3E, 1978, 2nd edition, Tata McGraw-Hill Education.

19. Newman C, Wharton J, Jacobson G. Retest stability of the tinnitus handicap questionnaire. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology 1995; 104 (9 Pt 1):718.