Accuracy and Pitfalls in the Smartphone-Based Audiometry Examination

Document Type : Systematic Review

Authors

1 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.

2 Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.

3 Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara.

10.22038/ijorl.2024.71187.3462

Abstract

Introduction:
Approximately 466 million people suffer from hearing loss worldwide, with Indonesia ranking fourth in Southeast Asia. However, conventional pure-tone audiometry is not yet available in many areas because of its high cost. Numerous available smartphone-based audiometry applications are potential alternative screening tools for hearing loss, especially in Indonesia. This study examined the findings on the validation of smartphone-based audiometry applications to assess hearing functions available in Indonesia.
 Materials and Methods:
Based on the established eligibility criteria, this study was conducted by browsing the relevant literature validating smartphone-based audiometry applications in Indonesia. Relevant study data, such as the author, year, location, implementation procedures, and outcomes, were extracted and summarized.
 Results:
This systematic review found 17 relevant and eligible publications. Of the six applications tested, 5 were found to have good validity, such as uHearTM, Audiogram MobileTM, AudCalTM, Hearing TestTM e-audiologia, and WuliraTM. All smartphone-based audiometry was tested only for the air conduction threshold and was influenced by several factors.
 Conclusion:
Because smartphone-based audiometry is inexpensive, simple, and more accessible than conventional audiometric testing, it can be useful as a screening modality or alternative approach to assess hearing function. Unfortunately, smartphone-based audiometry cannot replace conventional audiometry in diagnosing hearing impairment.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Sherwood Introduction to human physiology. 8th Edition. Cengage Learning; 2013.
  2. Lestari DS. Penyesuaian sosial pada mahasiswa tuli. Inklusi. 2016;3:101
  3. World health organization. Deafness and hearing loss. https://www.who.int/health-topics/hearing-loss#tab=tab_2. Accessed October 2021
  4. Indonesian ministry of health. Ministry of health's strategic plan for overcoming hearing loss. https://www.kemkes.go.id/article/view/17030300004/rencana-strategis-kemenkes-tanggulangi-gangguan-pendengaran.html. Accessed October 2021
  5. Health research and development agency ministry of health Republic of Indonesia. Basic health research. 2013
  6. Bright T, Pallawela Validated smartphone-based apps for ear and hearing assessments: A review. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies. 2015; 3:1-12
  7. Peer S, Fagan, JJ. Hearing loss in the developing world: evaluating the iPhone mobile device as a screening tool. South African Medical Journal. 2015; 105:35-39
  8. Sliwinska-kowalska M. Handbook of clinical neurology: occupational neurology. Elsevier. 2015; 131:2-528
  9. Clark JL, Swanepoel DW. Technology for hearing loss– as we know it and dream it. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9:408-13
  10. De Swanepoel W, Myburgh HC, Howe DM, et al. Smartphone hearing screening with integrated quality control and data management. Int J Audiol. 2014; 53:841-9
  11. Mahomed-Asmail F, Swanepoel DW, Eikelboom RH, et al. Clinical validity of hearscreenTM smartphone hearing screening for school children. Ear and hearing 2016;37:e11–e17
  12. Sandström J, Swanepoel DW, Carel Myburgh H, et al. Smartphone threshold audiometry in underserved primary healthcare contexts. International Journal of Audiology. 2016;55:232–238
  13. Van Tonder J, Swanepoel DW, Mahomed-Asmail F, et al. Automated smartphone threshold audiometry: Validity and time efficiency. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 2017;28:200–208
  14. Renda L, Selçuk ÖT, Eyigör H, et al. Smartphone based audiometric test for confirming the level of hearing; is it useable in underserved areas?. Journal of International Advanced Otology. 2016;12:61–66
  15. Szudek J, Ostevik A, Dziegielewski P, et al. Can uHear me now? Validation of an iPod-based hearing loss screening test. Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2012;41:s78-s84
  16. Lycke M, Boterberg T, Martens E, et al. Implementation of uHearTM - an iOS-based application to screen for hearing loss - in older patients with cancer undergoing a comprehensive geriatric assessment. Journal of Geriatric Oncology. 2016; 7:126-133
  17. Ogah SA. Hearing loss assessment: evaluating the uHearTM an ios-based application as a screening tool. Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry. 2017; 6:21-23.

 

 

  1. Li LYJ, Wang SY, Wu C J, et al. Screening for hearing impairment in older adults by smartphone-based audiometry, self-perception, HHIE screening questionnaire, and free-field voice test: comparative evaluation of the screening accuracy with standard pure-tone audiometry. JMIR MHealth and Uhealth. 2020;8:1-10
  2. Al-Abri R, Al-Balushi M, Kolethekkat A, et al. The accuracy of ios device-based uHear as a screening tool for hearing loss: a preliminary study from the middle east. Oman Med J. 2016;31:142–145
  3. Anuar KB, Rani MDBM, Hitam SB, et al. Exploring uHear hearing application as a mobile screening tool for the underprivileged. RMJ. 2018; 43:717-720.
  4. Corry M, Sanders M, Searchfield GD. The accuracy and reliability of an app-based audiometer using consumer headphones: pure tone audiometry in a normal hearing group. Int J Audiol. 2017; 56:706-710. ttps://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2017.1321791
  5. Kelly EA, Stadler ME, Nelson S, et al. Tablet-based screening for hearing loss: feasibility of testing in nonspecialty locations. Otology and Neurotology. 2018; 39:410–416
  6. Larrosa F, Rama-Lopez J, Benitez J, et al. Development and evaluation of an audiology app for iPhone/iPad mobile devices. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 2015;135:1119–1127
  7. Masalski M, Grysiński T, Kręcicki T. Hearing tests based on biologically calibrated mobile devices: Comparison with pure-tone audiometry. JMIR MHealth and Uhealth. 2018;6:e01
  8. Asghar M, Aasim MU, Ali M, et al. Comparison of e-audiologica.pl android hearing application with pure tone audiometry for hearing assessment in normal hearing group. RMJ. 2020;45:673-676
  9. Najeeb T, Ali M, Siddique N, et al. Can smart phone based android hearing application really help clinicians. Ophthalmology Update. 2020;18:64-67
  10. Aremu SK. Evaluation of the hearing test pro application as a screening tool for hearing loss assessment. Niger Med J. 2018;59:55–58
  11. Batte C, Olanyaju T, Mukisa J, et al. The accuracy of a mobile phone application (Wulira app) compared to standard audiometry in assessing hearing loss among patients on treatment for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Uganda. JPATS. 2020;1:20-25
  12. Livshitz L, Ghanayim R, Kraus C, et al. Application-based hearing screening in the elderly population. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology. 2017;126:36–41.
Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
Volume 36, Issue 2
March and April 2024
Pages 421-431

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics